Camera Expert Knowledge Required

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by Ghost Rider, Apr 8, 2015.

  1. No and no idea
    Was it physical cut and paste then?
     
  2. It was a conventionally set-up perspective of the building, but which included reference points found in the photo and on the area survey ........the building was colour rendered by hand on water colour paper, scanned and inserted into the photo using a method which I refer to as being based on The Dambusters...........It is a technique I developed specifically for a client that didn't like CGI.
     
  3. It's very cleverly done Al

    Not having experience with Photoshop, I have no clue but it is a nice piece of work
     
  4. The best thing about them is that my clients could enlarge them to A1 size, maybe even AO, before the resolution started to suffer.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. It looks perfect but where does bouncing come into it?
     
  6. Richo were the superior lenses back in the day I thought? NASA used them in the space missions :)
     
  7. Actually back in the day, Leica were the superior lenses............Apparently.
     
    #27 Ghost Rider, Apr 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 11, 2015
  8. It's not the 'bouncing'.....it's the 'distance'............
     
  9. Certainly were - but I meant between the two :)
     
  10. I thought NASA used Hasselblad's (zeiss lenses) and Nikon's on space missions?
     
  11. I know SFA about photography............apart from the fact my LZ10 is working again.....
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. That could well be the case - I do remember when I bought a Richo camera in the 80's part of the marketing at the time for Richo was 'as used by Nasa'.
     
  13. I'm no expert, but I just got a Panasonic GH4 to replace my Canon gear.

    Much smaller, lighter and 4K video recording. Really like it so far.
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information