Well didn't this all get out of hand quickly Bring back @finm , at least when he swore at you lot it took me a few Google searches to establish the true meaning. Cmon now chaps, toys away and back on track. So, has anyone else searched Google images for sugared tits? There's not much to see which I find surprising
ok, just this once but only to let you know i have been doing a fair bit o swearing in another thread. and to help yous cvnts out, i have concentrated on just the one word.
Seems even Theresa isn't convinced by Brexit even now after her comments today. Now imagine her giving you a soapy tit w£nk.
As usual your incorrect our very own forum Morrissey She was asked if there was another referendum and given she voted to remain before how would she vote now ? She replied to both with, "Iain, I could sit here and I could say I'd still vote Remain or I'd vote Leave just to give you an answer to that question. I'm being open and honest with you. What I did last time around was I looked at everything and came to a judgement and I'd do exactly the same this time around. But we're not having another referendum and that's absolutely crucial."
Seems like some people are unaware of the rules of this site. So let me remind you https://www.ducatiforum.co.uk/pages/rules/ If you can't comply then you know what to do And if you don't know what to do then I can help you
Mmm seems like the one who had been doing the reporting has broken those rules more than a few times.
Incorrect as usual. Show me where I have called anyone on here a c**t please? You want to post that word on a public forum, don't be surprised if it's reported. Call me that a number of times, don't be surprised if it's reported. Of course you can't, you'll just do your usual trick of not responding when asked for any proof. I'll save you the job. Here's a search of my activity linked to that word. 5 instances, all of them in the pieces quoted from other members.
Don't try to defend yourself from the lafties, Rob. Standing up in the face of their invective triggers their over-developed victim response. Best to let them continue to feel speh-shul.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...r-to-eu-lawsuit-over-rules-on-ordinary-courts It's in the eu's interest to create a them and us and a deal or no deal but people are missing the point under the fluff. We currently have a deal with the eu, when we leave we will still have a deal with eu. The only difference would be, is the deal under an agreement arranged between the eu and ourselves or will it be a deal between the eu and ourselves under wto rules so no matter what happens a deal will be there at the end. Currently and based on ONS figures it is being suggested that at a time of losing £10 billion a year from us, they also want wto that based on the last 12 months, the eu companies would lose the £42 billion difference per year, in what they sell to us and what we sell to them. I can see the powerhouse national companies within the eu countries, having some very stern talks with their leaders There is a cliff edge here however, but for the eu. Are they willing to sacrifice the balance of trade advantage in the tens of billions per year just to save the eu project?
Yes. There's nothing and no one they're not prepared to sacrifice to save their crazy project, which is why it will die.
