@noobie, I have no problem with people been bemused/amused/offended by my singular user name online. Although two other people online copied my creative zeal (its me on RT.com). I'm absofuckinglutely pro-abortion' women should & do have the right in sane nations to end the life of an unborn fetuse. For any reason but most notably rape-pregnancy comes to mind. @Air Duck, yep it sure is the american government & its military-industrial-complex. Who presidents Eisenhower warn us & JFK did about the pyramid of power within. But frankly were is the worlds outrage at 'barking-idiot-trumps' threats to totally destroy DPRK with its entire 25million citizens! Americans are now suffering under the new psyop cold-war 2.0 pronounced two point ooh. BRICS nations are the future & the failed empire agenda of usa coaxed onward by old-boys-club brits is in decline.
Say whaaaat, that's proper tin hat territory funnily enough, two figures that might surprise. The amount of guns sold is going up but the amount of people buying guns is going down. http://www.newsweek.com/us-gun-ownership-declines-312822 What seems to be happening is more of an evolution. Those perhaps as a hobby of hunting/shooting etc are buying more seeing it as a legal hobby and their right to buy as much as they want if they want too. A buddy of mine in his man cave has over 50 guns but regularly only use 3, hunting and range shooting. As bikers buying things "just in case but really because we want to as it's legal" in someways shows any hobby's addiction. But, where kids used to follow dad and grandad into hunting say, more and more would rather stay in their bedroom than 2 weeks in Alaska hunting and fishing in the cold and would prefer eating their vegan food whilst looking through gender forums. It seems new blood coming into the need for guns is dwindling population wise. It may take longer than it needs to be but it is going in the right direction
This is always going to be a difficult reply/conversation as firstly I think that Trump is the best thing to happen to USA and world politics since I can remember - he somehow managed to break the elite's stranglehold, you know - that world order you mention. Since man has existed it's likely that they've understood the importance of resources and amassing them accordingly - it's called survival - just as those woodpeckers and squirrels store acorns etc. Since humans have existed they've also understood that other humans are also after amassing those same resources, so then you get competition, and war. Humans are animals, and like the rest of the animal (and fish and insect) kingdoms they are hunter/gatherers and protect, and try and expand, their territory. What humans are not good at is making some utopian idea of global peace and happiness work in any meaningful way - for all the reasons stated above. It's a brutal fact that many of us don't like to accept. Control or be controlled by others, that is the choice. That's why every country needs armed forces, and weapons, and politicians who are willing to use them when justified, and that's why every country has armed forces. FWIW I do not believe for one second that President Trump wishes to annihilate the people of North Korea.
We'll both witness how the american president supposedly deals with the elite. Currently he's just added even more tax deductions for those people he made out he was going to usurp power from. And regarding the mass shooting effecting over 50-families, he just announced its "..not a gun issue, its a mental health issue.." These mass american killings are normal & should be looked upon as intrinsic of a dystopian society bent on propelling failure outward to other nations. And exceptional brilliance & morality meaning hero's & super humans inside its borders. I might even share a list of special sayings the elite have used to indoctrinate americans that their culture is bestest (spelt deliberately wrong for effect).
He's right, It is a mental health issue though isn't it? How many families do you think were affected by the Nice terror attack truck that killed 86 people and injured 458 others (many with life-changing injuries) ? Would you call that "a truck issue"? Of course not. What's the difference? Yes the other points you raise are also quite complex regards taxation and being forced to be nice to those in his government that he'd rather not, unfortunately many in the USA government are doing whatever possible to ensure he fails - and then return to decline-led-by-greed at the top, which is why Trump voters got him in. It's a sad situation but those 'world order masters' look like they're going to win through and Trump will have just been a little blip in their plans.
I'm sure the conclusion will come out as mental health issue as everyone is always labelled a nutjob by government agencies. The truck-attack in Nice was a terrorist blow-back attack too terrorize french citizens. Or people out celebrating the Bastille Day by people bent on making any cultural festival or event an opportunity to wreak havoc upon europe. Who happen to be seeking revenge for the destruction of whole swathes of their homeland. Not that I agree with it but I can see the whole scope of their anger & revenge mentality. It's just I'd prefer them killing politicians or attacking military facilities frankly.
We don't know the motivation for the guy who recently shot up the Texas church but somehow it's a "gun issue" yet the Nice terror attack isn't a "truck issue" because the attacker was politically/religiously motivated - is that what you're saying?
I really don't think he shot up a church, he murdered 26 known victims & shot a further 20 patrons. Shooting up a church gives the idea it was some drunken drive by. In europe we've got tough gun control laws so 'mental people' can't get a easily used tool for ending peoples lives. So they have now moved on to using large vehicular motorized transportation systems also coined trucks or lorries. I can't see why lorries are not equipped with a cut off system if something or someone bumps the front zone. Much like cars are disabled once the driver air-bag is deployed.
yeah, i don't think an anti terrorist package is offered on most truck new builds, leathers seats maybe, or even metallics?
Well its a simple concept, retrofitting lorries is going to be a cheaper policy. Than incorporating giant blocks of concrete onto every pavement or for large events. ABS is now a requirement of selling bikes from 2018 onwards with 2016/17 requiring a OEM package to upgrade bike to comply with the law on safety (in the european community). It's not a huge leap to expect lorry companies to either offer or provide a system for these style of terror attacks.
Understand I am not making light of the situation, but even as a stand up this guy has a valid argument
Yeah he's been used before. Some more facts are coming out that his ex mother in law used that church and there was bad blood. Also when the shooting started, a young man across from the church realised what was going on, got his own ar15 type weapon and challenged the shooter, a gunfight ensued and the gunman was shot which lead the gunman to flee the scene, avoiding further deaths. The young man then flagged down a passing vehicle and was giving feedback and info updates to the police as they followed the gunman who then it appears for now, took his own life
To be fair if you observe the cluster fuck that is usa they've now had their 276th mass shooting this year(although another database shows it as been 339). Defined as four or more people been shot at each incident. But as @noobie & his cohorts want to promote those trucks are fucking dangerous! So who's actually queuing up too spend holiday sight seeing america?
Having lived there and knowing these events, despite the media obsession for declaring otherwise, they are rare in comparisson to the rest of the America's, I would happily visit and live there again. A countries press and government does not always define the people
Of course fin, that's why I tend to say snp government rather than Scottish. Not all Scots have the jelly wobble head
