Son. He is estranged from his son, Xavier Alexander, who has been trans since it became the fashionable identity de jour c.202 (much like performative bitchiness about Musk is also a mark of tribal belonging). I strongly suspect there may be two sides to that story and that Musk's "radicalisation" is due in large part to the loss of his child to a pernicious "progressive" cult. "My X-son, Xavier d!sõwnēd me because he wanted to become a gîrl. I cry everyday when I think about it. I am supporting the fact that there should be no trãnsgēnder because it happened to my son, Xavier. I was tr!cked into signing documents for Xavier to become a girl. I had no choice because he thrēatened that he wanted a name change and he'll commît suîcîde if I didn't sign it. And I had to sign it because the lãw didn't prohibit that and I would've been held responsible if he committed suîcîde. But what I didn't know was that it also meant changing his gēnder. Afterwards when I realized what was going on, I told him I wasn't in support of it and he dîsownēd me as his dad just so hē could be a gîrl. It's incredibly ēvîl to tell a boy that he's supposed to be a girl and vice versa. I lost my son because of this and I don't want it to happen to anyone again." That actually sounds incredibly sad, and not something to be the subject of mockery.
So it would appear. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-n...r-daughter-vivian-wilson-interview-rcna163665 https://www.teenvogue.com/story/vivian-jenna-wilson-elon-musk-trans-youth I have no personal knowledge of either party but I know which version of events I find easier to believe.
I'm sure a puff piece in "Teen Vogue" and an NBC article couched in activist language are rigorous and balanced pieces of Woodward and Bernstein-esque reportage and, and of course, people such as Xaxier/Vivian are not at all prone to self-victimisation or histrionic exaggeration, so it's probably just a happy coincidence that those articles conform with your views.
