I'm Not The Person I Thought I Was!

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by Loz, Sep 23, 2015.

  1. So it's not your fault after all :upyeah:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Nor am I.

    Away for a cple days and come back to likes of 'likes' from OU.

    Life is over.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. I liked this post but didn't quite know what it meant, deserved a like though :smile:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Into resting - You probably already know about a dermoid cyst? Evidence that you "nearly" had a twin, these Cysts are usually filled with hair growth but can include teeth and other stuff.
     
    • Face Palm Face Palm x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Loz I'm definitely not the person you think I am!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. i haven't feeling myself for a few days now?.
     
    • Face Palm Face Palm x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Best not to worry too much, it's probably something very small
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  8. :Shifty::smile:
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Drama Queen Drama Queen x 1
  9. Weird indeed.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  10. UO ?
     
  11. Unknown origin or speedos to you ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  12. Abstinence is good!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. can you not type in bigger font?
     
  14. If many humans have living tissue in parts of their bodies which is genetically different from the rest of their tissue, where does that leave DNA testing?

    A sample of blood, saliva or tissue can have its DNA code tested, e.g. for the detection of crime, or for the establishment of paternity, and compared with another sample. This provides evidence which establishes criminality, paternity, or whatever to a high degree of accuracy - or so it has been said.

    But if it is scientifically possible for one person to give two samples with entirely different DNA codes, as it now seems, the accuracy of the tests is thrown into doubt. Perhaps some criminal convictions will be re-opened in the light of this.
     
  15. The nasty part is the reminder that raw meat can (and usually does) contain some nasty parasitic organisms. This underlines the importance of cooking meat thoroughly. Rare and bleeding meat ('steak tartare' etc) is not merely disgusting - it's also highly dangerous.
     
  16. I knew my DNA was in others... I did a good job of that in college.

    I had no idea I had there's in me :(
     
  17. I don't wish to discuss the size of my font.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. I Have seen a documentary, Horizon i think, where a woman was eventually demonstrated to produce two different DNA samples from different organ Biopsies.
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information