there should be limits surely? Jihadi John family has cost taxpayers up to £400k to house them | Daily Mail Online
Just imagine how much has been wasted paying those pricks who write articles in the Daily Fail. I think they are the script writers for that well paid pain in the arse Jeremy Vine on Radio Pooh also, more wasted money.
I know people criticise the mail for its shock horror right wing spin on things but is anyone able to say that anything they have reported here is inaccurate? If not this is clearly grounds for some searching questions of the state machinery that allows this piss taking to perpetuate.
Most people who don't buy the Mail quite rightly despise it for too many reasons to mention. That does not mean of course that the Mail is always wrong, just that the default position is to doubt anything they print.
Well it's not invented is it? Easy enough for the powers that be to check and deny it if it was. Let's wait and see if they do before "killing the messenger" shall we?
Thank you for a little bit of sense. As you say it's one thing to question a paper's political leanings, but has anyone ever proved the Mail has made up facts? And everyone forgets that it rightly took a flyer and named Stephen Lawrence's killers after it looked as if they'd escaped justice.
It's a headline that sells newspapers I suspect and the facts that cause friction. Would you or anyone else know about things like this if they were not reported. Do you care? Do you want to know where your taxes are spent?
Do you think they made it up? Would you prefer them to ignore it and print only good news in your paper? Shit happens why not tell people and let them make up their own minds?