Norton Dominator Ss

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by stickywicket, Sep 19, 2015.

  1. Saw this today. £25K. Doesnt look too comfortable though. My mates waiting for delivery of his. £22k as he is not having the aluminium tank!

    IMG_0035.JPG IMG_0036.JPG
     
    • Like Like x 5
  2. It needs the aluminium tank .
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. Looks like it's a mistake..............and why build a 'Dominator' when the 'Commando' was a better bike........the only good thing about Norton was the featherbed frame.
     
  4. Oooh, wash your mouth out ! Whilst I wouldn't go back, I rode a '62 650ss for 15 years. I rode a Commando for about 3 weeks, it was appalling. Didn't call it hydrospastic suspension for nothing. Andy
     
    #4 Android853sp, Sep 20, 2015
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  5. "the only good thing about Norton was the featherbed frame"................

    ....but maybe my view is coloured owing to having owned an oil well (Navigator) for a year or so........

    But the one in the pics still doesn't look right...........I keep picturing a very long legged hunchback on it........(an ex-Harley rider, maybe).
     
  6. no mater what looks it v.cool. you wouldn't buy it to win race's
     
  7. I'd rather have Mervyn's Triton
     
  8. Wright iron get away....mervyns leaving that bike in his will to me!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. that's what you think ...... :cool:
     
  10. Ask mervyn
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. has he been two-timing me ? :confused:
     
  12. Three! :p
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Yes
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. I don't believe it !
     
  15. I'll have it May till August :D
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. On reflection, I don't think my legs could perform the kick-start.....
     
  17. doesn't have an electric start by any chance does it ?
     
  18. No but you get the motor, I'll do the cables and idrinkbeer can fit it :D
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
Do Not Sell My Personal Information