As per the title - what are the pros & cons of either when fitted to an old Bevel with FPS cast wheels? It's wearing radial Conti Attacks at the moment for which I have no complaints but the fitter certainly did when trying to get the inner tubes in. I'm assuming the strong side walls make that difficult.
Agreed, I'm using BT46 on my old Guzzi and have no complaints. Previously used Pirelli Sport Demon which were fine but, last time I wanted tyres I couldn't get the sizes so bought the Bridgestones. Work fine and have outlasted the Pirelli miles-wise, they were even a little easier to fit on the (rough cast) alloy wheels -though still harder than'modern' tyres on smooth wheels.
Bridgestones do seem to be the de-facto choice for the older bikes possibly because they have the greatest size choice and look to have been built specifically for that role. I've never been a 'Bridgestone man' because a few years back I swapped them out on the V-Raptor for Michelins & then Metzelers both of which I felt to be much much better. As these are of a much newer construct perhaps I should give them a go. They're readily available and well priced at around £240 a pair. So is there any, discernable, difference between a crossply & radial?
This is what I was told years ago so there no evidence I can offer. Radials are supposed to be used with stiffer chassis and cross ply deals with flex and vagueness better. I’ve gone from radial to cross ply on an older bike and it’s more relaxed and calmer, feeling more confident. I won’t go near Bridgestone radial really don’t get on with them. But BT45/BT46 are the best cross ply’s available , both grip and mileage. Heidenau are also very good cross ply, can’t recall which model. Bought a cb500 with a set on years ago and couldn’t believe how much grip they had from what “ I thought “ was an unknown manufacturer.
