Triumph Rocket Iii

Discussion in 'Other Bikes' started by comfysofa, Aug 14, 2019.

    • Agree Agree x 3
  1. Soooo MCN 'When Triumph launched the Rocket, they weren’t in a position to cast their own crankcases, which meant they ended up heavier than they would have liked. Now they can, so the cases are lighter, which goes a long way towards an 18kg saving'.

    Surly they designed the engine so it was up to them, don't think it was based on a current car engine was it? And do they really cast their own crank cases now? :thinkingface:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. They’ve obviously lost ground to the Diavel.
     
  3. I think these look great!
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Thatll be the weight difference...
     
  5. Very much a ‘because we can’ bike.

    Nice low seat tho ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. I fookin lurve it .........
     
  7. I love the Diavel so it's almost inevitable that I love the styling of this...and the power :punch:
     
  8. Urgh
     
    #9 Cream_Revenge, Aug 15, 2019
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2019
  9. How dare they compare it to the Duc 1299!!
    (or any Panigale for that matter!)
     
  10. Same torque as the XDiavel but 60kg heavier and a 2.3l engine.
    All show and no go..,
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  11. 2.5l
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Thats worse!
     
  13. 200cc more hole. That accounts for some weight saving.
     
  14. Not quite ;)

    XDiavel:
    POWER - 152 hp (112 kW) @ 9500 rpm
    TORQUE - 126 Nm (93 ft lb) @ 5,000 rpm
    Dry weight - 220 kg

    Rocket 3:
    Max Power 165 bhp (123 kW) @ 6,000rpm
    Max Torque 221 Nm (163 ft lb) @ 4,000rpm
    Dry weight - 291 kg
     
    #15 Stanford, Aug 15, 2019
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2019
  15. Like to see a moped muppet nick it & try pushing it with their foot whilst riding said scooter. It would break their leg; hopefully :upyeah:
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. my bad, I glanced at the Diavel figures and took the nm for torque.
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information