I've run a 180 rear for several years. Gives much wider option on tyres, no impact on handling at all. I have replaced the original hugger with a carbon fibre aftermarket unit and no problems with tyre rubbing.
Still a fair bit of choice in 170/60? I've used Dunlop Qualifiers and Bridgestone BT-016. https://www.bikespeeduk.com/index.php?act=viewCat&catId=43 https://www.tyreleader.co.uk/motorbike-tyres-170-60-17/?orderby=prix
Not a carby but I have just ordered my second 180/55/17. And I did rub a hole in the hugger, not side but front so took it off. Looks far better and no issues have arisen as a result.
Given the huge effect the size of the fairing has in crosswords, can't think the tyre size will make any significant difference
Had 180 when I bought it. Then renewed with 180. After that, saw 170 was factory spec so next change went that way. The change was like she'd lost her fat arse. Simply more nimble.
I have three carby 900's and a 900ss ie. Three have 170 rear tyres and one a 180. I'm not sure the 180 would clear a std Ducati hugger? In Oz its easier to get 180 width tyres.
Is the 170 rear tyre what it comes with out of the factory? My 1993 900SS is due some new tyres and grateful of any recommendations. My bike has the standard rear hugger so would probably avoid the 180 size to avoid potential issues. Thanks!
Bought my bike (900SL) it has a 180 pirelli rear and I assume standard carbon hugger, no issues. My mate had a 900SS with 180 and it rubbed on the chain? When I renew I’ll go for a 180 again