Separate names with a comma.
Let my qualify that soz. Exactly
Exactly.
And on,and on and just in case on again....:-)
This has gone off thread again or should I say that its gone back to the lack of threads with this picture..:-)
But is it also the truth that the last lots who were in dithered and couldn't make their mind despite being in power since '98 and like any good...
I can't believe that any quality manufacturer would ever make their new model worse than the outgoing version .
Correct me obviously but isn't it the responsibility of the jury not to be compromised by any comment which might give a leaning ?
I think that this has killed this thread Andy.Hee.:-)
Back on thread,I hear that the judge has ticked off them PM over a comment he had reportedly made saying that he was a fan.What a Pratt,yet...
But its not my bed...
I heard it from one of your colleagues.. :-)
Its the right thread,that's why he got knocked off...
I heard from a colleague of yours that were going to say that...
I think that this post is not whether this incident is hear say or not,its about some peoples total lack of moral fibre to actually do the right...
I believe that Jeff got this one completely right.
I would never drink unleaded,only the very best for me I'm afraid.
Of course it would make complete sense but that's not the reality, the reality was that it wouldn't and didn't replace any of those docs,it was on...
I suppose that compulsory DNA swabs at birth wouldn't be the next control move then.Don't even think that its never been mooted in some back room.
Or maybe on the inside of your hand,easier to palm off.:-)
And it was going to cost more than 2p with no other perceived value other than control.
