Also there is no middle man dealers commissions to pay, it could result in a fair amount of work & reduce a loss making factory overheads and bring in cash flow, plus the PR - just as importantly have the bikes being seen at meets, ride outs etc. Worse case scenario they make some bikes at cost, whilst they get on their feet, with some good ads.
Shit on it. That’s quite a list of high risk stuff! Kinda makes Ducati’s fuel sensors, cracking pipes and faulty sensors look positive…
Scrap it is, never going to be sorted and turned into a safe bike, as it will be cheaper just to replace, most where already ornaments, now they can all be ornaments compulsory ......
What an absolute disgrace those bikes and those involved in it are. (Gardner et el) Imagine if someone had a serious RTC on one of Garners V4's; the following litigation would be an absolute nightmare.
wonder if the bikes TVS are going to fulfill will eliminate these issues? so glad I didn’t pony up 20k for a naked.
That fucker should be in jail. Shows a poor show on U.K. justice he isn’t. Even found guilty of illegally using pension funds and fuck all happens. Yet don’t wear a mask in tesco or meet a mate and have a coffee on a walk (previously ) and cops all over it!!
This is an eye watering read! Engines seizing, throttle sticking, oil and valve issues, blooming heck. Everytime there were puff pieces written by MCN, none of the issues ever got mentioned, but none of the bikes are likely to last more than a thousand or so miles of the issues are that bad! Appreciate MCN didn’t do 1k miles on one but surely they should have questioned the total lack of testing
The worst thing is TVS are employing Skinner.I wouldn’t touch anything he is involved in.Learnt my lesson on that one.
Christ, that makes a worrying read. I'm glad I didnt get my bike. I always had questions regarding the engine and potential issues, and now it seems they were founded. I do still get contacted by the new company asking if I am still interested in completing my order when they are built. My response is always the same: yes I still like the look of the bike, but want some assurances regarding quality, warranty, spares availability, and servicing. I sincerely hope the new company can make some bikes and become profitable, even if it isnt the RR/SS.
I saw one of those Nortons at the Super sausage meet one or two years ago but after reading that defect list (if accurate) I wonder if the the geezer made it home! (he didn't stall and drop the bike on leaving).
The bikes still look lovely, but I question whether they will hold their money as expected now this is public. I want to ride my bikes, and with such a long list of faults likely to lunch the engine, and then no way of getting spares, that would worry me.
Even if all the faults were corrected I’d personally never feel confident on it. Feel for the people who managed to get one then get this news.
