Speeding Quiz

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by broke, Sep 8, 2017.

  1. If he was doing double the speed limit he'd need a good barrister to avoid a ban. Come on then,,.....when do you put us out of our guess/misery.
     
  2. Was sheep worrying part of his offence?
     
  3. Speeding fine in a 30?

    Eleventy-one gonzillion pounds. Per week. For life.

    Still too lenient, in my view. I think the punishment should be genocide.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  4. good idea. can we trial it in Sussex and yon other place that sounds similar first?
     
  5. Genocide seems a bit harsh mate? And who would you unload genocide on?
     
  6. see previous post
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. For a first offence, I think it's proportionate.

    First up would be finm, for being a DQ. Have you met finm the DQ? I reckon he's a serial speeder.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  8. never touched the stuff. rots yer teeth.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Drama Queen Drama Queen x 1
  9. How much?
    Depends if it gets calculated by Diane Abbot or someone with any degree of ability.
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  10. Well done young man, spot on but he was also given 6 little points as well. They also said it was touch and go whether he'd lose his licence.


    Not far off Mr Exige sir.


    Hang on now, it was only a minor motoring offence :eek:
     
  11. Holy fuck, that's fecking scary, a grand for doing 50, what the fuck has happened to the world?? :(
     
  12. I don't understand why speeding fines are now linked to salary/earnings. A scrote who refuses to work and is on benefits will pay (next to) bugger all while the rest of us that got off our arses and do stuff for a living will need to dig deep. How is that fair? Scrotes won't be deterred at all cos they won't have to pay.

    Speeding is speeding no matter what your financial status is.

    This government is clueless.
     
    • Agree Agree x 12
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  13. Because punishing speeding isn't the aim. Maximising the revenue stream is. :mad: As you say, why pursue a scroat who won't / can't pay, jut devise a system that enables you to milk the placid masses. :mad:
     
    • Agree Agree x 9
  14. :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: Cnuts!!!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. Touché :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. I know it is. So what do we do about it?
     
  17. Bend over and takes it like our lame ass nation always does :( .......Or, don't ever speed o_O
     
  18. So how does it work if like me Your retired have a small monthly pension but a wife that works and brings in a good wage. Is it just 'MY' income or 'family' income they take into consideration?
     
  19. 100%. It's a fact that they often won't charge scumbags for some minor offences that the rest of us would get nicked for as they know they won't be getting much out of it, the whole thing stinks and slowly turns the hard-working elements of our society into embittered haters.

    They need a better model to raise revenue or perhaps stop giving so much of it away to lazy/dodgy arseholes.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. So are people like MAG (and the car equivalent) taking this issue up with government?
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information