the original post had the link Read more: The 48 questions Kate McCann wouldn't answer - and the one she did | Mail Online Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook but seeing as many do not regard the daily mail as being accurate maybe the bbc website and its 51 questions are more credible 7 SEPTEMBER QUESTIONS TO KATE McCANN 1 On 3 May 2007 at around 2200, when you entered the apartment what did you see and do, where did you look, and what did you touch? 2 Did you look inside the wardrobe in the bedroom? She said she wouldn't answer. 3 (Shown two photographs of the wardrobe) Can you describe its contents? 4 Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (a photograph of which was shown to her), been disturbed? Had someone passed behind this sofa? 5 How much time did you spend searching in the apartment after realising that your daughter Madeleine had disappeared? 6 Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted? 7 Assuming that Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins alone at home to go to the Tapas to raise the alarm, not least because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment? 8 Why did you not ask the twins at that moment what had happened to their sister, or why did you not ask them later? 9 When you raised the alarm in the Tapas what specific words were used? 10 What happened after raising the alarm at the Tapas? 11 Did you have a mobile phone with you at that moment? 12 Why did you go to warn your friends instead of shouting from the balcony? 13 Who contacted the authorities? 14 Who took part in the searches? 15 Did someone outside the group learn, in the moments that followed, of Madeleine's disappearance? 16 Did any neighbour offer you help after the alarm was raised about the disappearance? 17 What did the expression "we let her down" mean? 18 Did Jane tell you that she had seen a man carrying a child that night? 19 How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted? 20 During the searches after police arrived, in which places were Madeleine searched for, and in what way? 21 Why did the twins not wake up during the search or when they went upstairs? 22 Whom did you telephone after the discovery? 23 Did you call Sky News? 24 Did you know of any danger of calling the media alerting them of the abduction, since this could influence the abductor? 25 Did you request the presence of a priest? 26 In what way was the face of Madeleine, in photographs or by other means, released? 27 Is it true that during the search you remained seated on Madeleine's bed in your room without moving? 28 What was your behaviour like during that night? 29 Did you manage to sleep? 30 Before the trip to Portugal did you make a comment about a bad feeling or premonition about it? 31 What was Madeleine's behaviour like? 32 Did Madeleine suffer from any infirmity or take medication? 33 What was Madeleine's relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and fellow pupils? 34 Regarding your professional life, in how many hospitals and in which ones did you work? 35 What was your speciality as a doctor? 36 Do you work shifts in emergency wards or other departments? 37 Do you work in the daytime? 38 Why did you stop working at a certain point? 39 Is it true or not that the twins have difficulty falling asleep, that they are restless and that this upsets you? 40 Is it true or not that at certain times you felt desperate at your children's attitude and that this upsets you a lot? 41 Is it true or not that in England you went so far as thinking about handing over Madeleine to a relative to look after? 42 At home (in England) did you give medication to your children and what kind of medication? 43 (Various films had been shown to her of the inspection by forensic dogs, where one can see their signalling indications of the scent of a human corpse and traces of human blood as well as the comments by the expert overseeing the exercise.) Having seen the film and after the scent of a corpse was signalled in her bedroom near the wardrobe, and behind the sofa by the window in the sitting room, Kate McCann said she could not explain anything more than she already had. 44 She was asked about the sniffer dog that signalled human blood behind the above-mentioned sofa. She said she could not explain anything more than she already had. 45 She was asked about the scent of corpse which was signalled in the vehicle she hired about a month after the disappearance, with number plate 59-DA-27. She said she could not explain anything more than she already had. 46 When the presence of human blood was signalled in the boot of the same vehicle Kate McCann said she could not explain anything more than she already had. 47 Confronted with the result of the sample of Madeleine's DNA, whose analysis was carried out by a British laboratory, found behind the sofa and in the boot of the vehicle, as previously described, Kate McCann said she could not explain anything more than she already had. 48 Did you have any responsibility or involvement in the disappearance of your daughter Madeleine? 49 Are you aware that the fact of your not answering the questions put to you jeopardise the investigation that was aimed at finding out what happened to your daughter, she answered: "Yes, if the investigation thinks that." 50 Do you have anything to add? She said: "No." 51 Her lawyer was asked to comment. He said he had nothing to state or request.
So she cannot provide any more information than she already has??? Hardly a crime and hardly tier 3/5 interviews, or decent forensic interviews. So the SEnior Investigating Officer has a theory that he is determined to make the facts fit. Oh is this the same 'detective' currently being sued ? Mmmmm
If any of my family went missing and the investigating police asked me something,I'd answer. If I didn't know,or I couldn't remember,I'd say so. No need to be a drama queen when asked,especially when the nipper is still missing. Refusing to answer questions doesn't make them guilty,but my question is,why would you? After all,they've asked the British public for financial help to find their daughter,but refuse to answer questions that might help the search. It seems the majority of the British media parrot the same story: Upstanding British middle-class public servants leading perfect lives,suddenly interrupted by disappearance of one of their children,in fashionable European destination.(which miraculously degrades into a third-world country when they have to engage with the natives...flawed legal system...bumbling amateur Detectives...shifty-eyed Gypsy child-traffickers on every corner..etc,etc) No blame can be attached to the parents in any way whatsoever,and any suspicions raised by the incompetent Portuguese police is howled down by the shrieking harridans of the British press...."How dare they!!!!!!!...don't they realise Kate McCann is one of us?" This aggressive shit-storm of McCann denials/finger pointing/media manipulation is what makes many people suspicious of the parents. I'm keeping an open mind,but their behaviour, in public at least, I find odd?.......insincere?..unusual?........to say the very least.
In all these cases, many people assume the parents are involved. The tenacity of the McCann's in continuing to keep the profile high would be odd if they were guilty. I think the fact they are both professionals makes zero difference. Also, given the police often suspect the immediate family, I'd personally be pretty cautious answering anything without a lawyer. No point compounding the initial crime by having my own liberty wrongly taken and leaving my other children in a difficult situation.
Madeleine McCann: Kate and Gerry McCann appeal against former detective who claims they covered up Madeleine's death | Home News | News | The Independent
Not one shred of evidence to back up their story.. All of the evidence ..and there is a LOT! Proves that their account is a fabrication aimed squarely at self preservation .. Why all the high level help in the face of the evidence? Connections... Why do so many believe this crap.. Dose nobody care about what happened to Madeline? Shameful
From reading the allegedly unanswered questions, the police did seem to have an answer to the question "Why?" in mind. They asked if Madeleine was on any medication and also why the twins had not woken up. Looks like they suspected they had all been given something to help them sleep and something happened to Madeleine as a result. If all the children were given the same thing and with the knowledge of all the parents, there's your reason why the other parents might have colluded in any subsequent actions. Let's be clear, I'm not suggesting this is what happened, merely that this may be what the police suspected could have happened.
There is a good reason why the police will "often suspect the immediate family". Statistically they are BY FAR the most likely to have been involved... That is an inescapable fact.
I would not be surprised if it panned out like this in the end... The kids were put to bed, to ensure they slept while unattended they were sedated (this is believed to be true) the McCanns were in the medical field so would have access to drugs to do this The twins were of course the same age so received the same dose, Maddie received a different dose due to her age (logical) They got the dose wrong for Maddie and she died. The body was disposed of (perhaps several hundred miles away) and the 'abduction' fabricated. I'd love to be wrong, but I can't help feeling it's plausible. Mrs McCann was interviewed on Radio 2 a few years ago,many she said something which I found chilling, and almost a confession... "I know the truth, and god knows the truth and that's all that matters" it just didn't sit right with me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
